Siat v. Wong

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Siat v. Wong

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 2020

Docket2020 NYSlipOp 50227(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Siat v. Wong (Siat v. Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siat v. Wong, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Yee Moy Siat, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Kim Hock Wong, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered April 16, 2019, after a nonjury trial, in favor of defendant and dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Judgment (Sabrina B. Kraus,J.), entered April 16, 2019, affirmed, without costs.

In reviewing a judgment from a bench trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to credibility of witnesses (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 AD2d 544 [1990]). Applying that standard here, and giving deference to the trial court's credibility determinations, we do not disturb the dismissal of plaintiff's breach of contract claim. A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the finding that defendant satisfied his obligations under the parties' oral agreement by paying plaintiff the total sum of $9,000 in exchange for plaintiff vacating certain leased premises prior to the lease expiration date.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: February 14, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yee Moy Siat, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Kim Hock Wong, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered April 16, 2019, after a nonjury trial, in favor of defendant and dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Judgment (Sabrina B. Kraus,J.), entered April 16, 2019, affirmed, without costs.

In reviewing a judgment from a bench trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to credibility of witnesses (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 AD2d 544 [1990]). Applying that standard here, and giving deference to the trial court's credibility determinations, we do not disturb the dismissal of plaintiff's breach of contract claim. A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the finding that defendant satisfied his obligations under the parties' oral agreement by paying plaintiff the total sum of $9,000 in exchange for plaintiff vacating certain leased premises prior to the lease expiration date.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: February 14, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Siat v. Wong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siat-v-wong-nyappterm-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack