Sia v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sia v. New York City Transit Authority

40 A.D.2d 995, 338 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3149

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1972·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination, dated March 11, 1971, dismissing petitioner from his position as a patrolman in respondent’s employ as of February 24, 1971. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the period of suspension without pay to that of December 17, 1970 to January 16, 1971 and ordering that all pay for the period of suspension from January 16, 1971 to March 11, 1971 be paid to petitioner, less any income received by him for the latter period. As so modified, determination confirmed, including petitioner’s dismissal, without costs. In our opinion, the record as to whether petitioner effectively waived any statutory rights to be compensated for the above-mentioned back pay is so confused that it would not be fair to him to hold that he did so waive (cf. Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A D 2d 260, 263, affd. 15 N Y 2d 627; Matter of Schmidt v. Macedonio, 47 Misc 2d 889). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination, dated March 11, 1971, dismissing petitioner from his position as a patrolman in respondent’s employ as of February 24, 1971. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the period of suspension without pay to that of December 17, 1970 to January 16, 1971 and ordering that all pay for the period of suspension from January 16, 1971 to March 11, 1971 be paid to petitioner, less any income received by him for the latter period. As so modified, determination confirmed, including petitioner’s dismissal, without costs. In our opinion, the record as to whether petitioner effectively waived any statutory rights to be compensated for the above-mentioned back pay is so confused that it would not be fair to him to hold that he did so waive (cf. Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A D 2d 260, 263, affd. 15 N Y 2d 627; Matter of Schmidt v. Macedonio, 47 Misc 2d 889). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Sia v. New York City Transit Authority, 40 A.D.2d 995, 338 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

40 A.D.2d 995 (Sia v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related