Shy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shy v. State

157 S.W.3d 231, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1821, 2004 WL 2709494

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 30, 2004

DocketED 84131

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 231 (Shy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shy v. State, 157 S.W.3d 231, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1821, 2004 WL 2709494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Shy appeals the judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. 1

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Shy’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute was affirmed in State v. Shy, 52 S.W.3d 585 (Mo.App. E.D.2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI