Shvarts v. O'Connor
This text of 692 So. 2d 960 (Shvarts v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm case no. 96-2831. In case no. 96-3497, the O’Connors appealed an order determining the amount of a superse-deas bond on appeal. Review of such an order is by motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.310(f). Had review been sought in this matter, it would have been disposed of by us months ago. Instead, by designating it as an appeal, it followed the lengthy course of all full appeals. As we have affirmed the lower court’s ruling on the merits in case no. 96-2831, the issue regarding the supersedeas bond is now moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
692 So. 2d 960, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4202, 1997 WL 194651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shvarts-v-oconnor-fladistctapp-1997.