Shuttle v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shuttle v. Wilson

808 So. 2d 281, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2247, 2002 WL 313207

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-1915

StatusPublished

This text of 808 So. 2d 281 (Shuttle v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shuttle v. Wilson, 808 So. 2d 281, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2247, 2002 WL 313207 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge.

Appellant challenges a final judgment enforcing a three-party settlement agreement between Appellant, Appellees, and Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc., which is not a party to this appeal. We have reviewed the evidence relied on by the trial court and find that the evidence does not support the existence of a binding settlement agreement. We therefore reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge.

Appellant challenges a final judgment enforcing a three-party settlement agreement between Appellant, Appellees, and Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc., which is not a party to this appeal. We have reviewed the evidence relied on by the trial court and find that the evidence does not support the existence of a binding settlement agreement. We therefore reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

808 So. 2d 281, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2247, 2002 WL 313207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuttle-v-wilson-fladistctapp-2002.