Shutter v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
This text of 205 A.D.2d 817 (Shutter v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered June 17, 1993 in Greene County, which, inter alia, partially granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and declared that defendant is not obligated to provide underinsurance benefits to plaintiffs.
In our view, Supreme Court correctly concluded that defendant is not obligated to provide underinsurance benefits to plaintiffs. Defendant disclaimed coverage under the underinsured motorist endorsement in its policy due to plaintiffs’ delay in advising defendant of a potential personal injury claim and plaintiffs’ failure to immediately forward to defendant a copy of the summons and complaint in that action. Under the circumstances, plaintiffs’ clear failure to timely comply with the policy provisions vitiated coverage.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.D.2d 817, 613 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shutter-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.