Shutt, Admr. v. . Farm

139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 803, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 239
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 2, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 926 (Shutt, Admr. v. . Farm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shutt, Admr. v. . Farm, 139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 803, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 239 (N.C. 1927).

Opinion

Civil action in tort to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of defendant. *Page 804

Eugene Shutt, a man 34 years of age, had worked on defendant's farm for more than seven years and had been foreman of the place about three and one-half years, when on 29 September, 1923, while disking a field with a caterpillar tractor, preparatory to sowing grain, he was mortally injured in a fall beneath the tractor as it ran too near a ditch, the bank giving way and causing the tractor to turn over.

It is not alleged that the tractor was defective. Plaintiff bottoms his action on the alleged circumstance of negligence in that the defendant failed to warn the deceased of the soft ground and the danger of running too near the ditch.

At the close of plaintiff's evidence the defendant lodged a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, which was allowed. Plaintiff appeals, assigning error. Plaintiff's intestate was the victim of an unfortunate accident, but the evidence fails to disclose any liability on the part of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 803, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shutt-admr-v-farm-nc-1927.