Shuter v. Page
This text of 11 Johns. 196 (Shuter v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Courts have allowed, pleas in, many instances, apparently as inconsistent as thosedn the present case. In Stibbard v. Glover, (Barnes, 364.) non cepit, property in a stranger, and liberum tenementum were allowed to be pleaded together, in replevin. So, not guilty and justification may be pleaded in trespass. We se© no reason, for distinguishing the present casp, from those decided,
Motion denied.
Com. Dig. Pleader, E. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Johns. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuter-v-page-nysupct-1814.