Shuter v. Page

11 Johns. 196
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Johns. 196 (Shuter v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shuter v. Page, 11 Johns. 196 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Courts have allowed, pleas in, many instances, apparently as inconsistent as thosedn the present case. In Stibbard v. Glover, (Barnes, 364.) non cepit, property in a stranger, and liberum tenementum were allowed to be pleaded together, in replevin. So, not guilty and justification may be pleaded in trespass. We se© no reason, for distinguishing the present casp, from those decided,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Derby v. Gallup
5 Minn. 119 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1860)
Walrath v. Barton
11 Barb. 382 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuter-v-page-nysupct-1814.