Shuter v. Hallett
1 Cai. Cas. 114, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 189
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 114 (Shuter v. Hallett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shuter v. Hallett, 1 Cai. Cas. 114, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 189 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
The commission is as much the defendant’s as the plaintiff’s and he may take the benefit of it on trial. We cannot, therefore, vacate the rule, but the plaintiff may have one to proceed to trial notwithstanding the commission.
Motion denied.
Radcliff and Livingston, Justices, absent.
See Brain v. Rodelichs and Shivers, ante, 74. See Note [2] ante.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 114, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuter-v-hallett-nysupct-1803.