Shuter v. Hallet

1 Cai. Cas. 517, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 330
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 517 (Shuter v. Hallet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shuter v. Hallet, 1 Cai. Cas. 517, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 330 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice of the court has never been according to the application. It would be often oppressive, [655]*655and amount to a denial of right, as the defendant may not be able to comply with the condition, yet have a complete defence to the suit.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 517, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuter-v-hallet-nysupct-1804.