Shute v. Stattman
254 A.D. 783, 4 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7592
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[784]*784no basis for an affirmative judgment in defendant’s favor, because they failed to plead a counterclaim for the recovery of these usurious payments and, in any event, an action therefor is required to be commenced within one year after the payment. (General Business Law, § 381.) Conclusion of law No. 8 is reversed. Appeal from findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision dismissed. No appeal lies therefrom. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shute v. Stattman, 254 A.D. 783, 4 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 783 (Shute v. Stattman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garcia v. Valdes (In re Garcia)
167 B.R. 341 (E.D. New York, 1994)
Mill Street Realty, Inc. v. Reineke
159 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.
280 A.D. 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)