Shurtleff v. Thompson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Shurtleff v. Thompson

63 Me. 118

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 Me. 118 (Shurtleff v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shurtleff v. Thompson, 63 Me. 118 (Me. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Bescript.

At the March term, 1871, of the superior court, the petitioner, one of the defendants in the original action, was defaulted without appearance. He intended to appear by counsel which he had previously retained for that purpose.

He had a full, legal defence; but his counsel failed to appear and make it, for the reason that the latter mistakenly suj>posed that the petitioner’s co-defendant’s counsel also appeared for the petitioner.

Held — that a review be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bescript.

At the March term, 1871, of the superior court, the petitioner, one of the defendants in the original action, was defaulted without appearance. He intended to appear by counsel which he had previously retained for that purpose.

He had a full, legal defence; but his counsel failed to appear and make it, for the reason that the latter mistakenly suj>posed that the petitioner’s co-defendant’s counsel also appeared for the petitioner.

Held — that a review be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Me. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shurtleff-v-thompson-me-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack