Shurtleff v. Thompson

63 Me. 118
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bescript.

At the March term, 1871, of the superior court, the petitioner, one of the defendants in the original action, was defaulted without appearance. He intended to appear by counsel which he had previously retained for that purpose.

He had a full, legal defence; but his counsel failed to appear and make it, for the reason that the latter mistakenly suj>posed that the petitioner’s co-defendant’s counsel also appeared for the petitioner.

Held — that a review be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shurtleff v. Thompson, 63 Me. 118 (Me. 1873).

63 Me. 118 (Shurtleff v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dupont v. Labbe
89 A.2d 741 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1952)
Tuttle v. Scott
51 P. 849 (California Supreme Court, 1898)