Shurter v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shurter v. Bailey

263 A.D. 1025, 33 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7932

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 1025 (Shurter v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shurter v. Bailey, 263 A.D. 1025, 33 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment entered in the county of Tompkins upon a verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants. The action was brought to recover damages for fraud and deceit, it being alleged that the defendants, as principal and agent, induced plaintiffs to purchase certain real property on which were located certain wells, the water of which was contaminated. The court properly submitted to the jury all of the questions of actionable fraud as questions of fact and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment entered in the county of Tompkins upon a verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants. The action was brought to recover damages for fraud and deceit, it being alleged that the defendants, as principal and agent, induced plaintiffs to purchase certain real property on which were located certain wells, the water of which was contaminated. The court properly submitted to the jury all of the questions of actionable fraud as questions of fact and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1025, 33 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shurter-v-bailey-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack