Shure v. State
This text of 971 So. 2d 1016 (Shure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elaine SHURE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Edgar Lee Elzie, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges her conviction for making a false report of child abuse as well as the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court. We find no merit as to the issue addressing the conviction but reverse the award of restitution because the State failed to present competent evidence to support the award. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new restitution hearing. See Forlano v. State, 964 So.2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
BARFIELD, WOLF, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
971 So. 2d 1016, 2008 WL 89834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shure-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.