Shur v. Shur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shur v. Shur

121 A.D.2d 452, 503 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 452 (Shur v. Shur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shur v. Shur, 121 A.D.2d 452, 503 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 for modification of a support obligation, the petitioner wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Ryan, J.), entered November 15, 1984, which denied her application.

Order modified, by increasing the amount of support to $200 per week nunc pro tunc to May 6, 1981. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a determination of the amount of any arrears.

[453]*453Under all the circumstances, the support obligation should have been modified to increase it to $200 per week. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 for modification of a support obligation, the petitioner wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Ryan, J.), entered November 15, 1984, which denied her application.

Order modified, by increasing the amount of support to $200 per week nunc pro tunc to May 6, 1981. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a determination of the amount of any arrears.

[453]*453Under all the circumstances, the support obligation should have been modified to increase it to $200 per week. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 452, 503 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shur-v-shur-nyappdiv-1986.