Shur v. Dufault

California Court of Appeal

Shur v. Dufault

132 Cal. App. 635

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 16, 1933

DocketCiv. No. 1448

StatusPublished

This text of 132 Cal. App. 635 (Shur v. Dufault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shur v. Dufault, 132 Cal. App. 635 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MARKS, J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal. The record discloses that judgment was rendered and entered in favor of respondents in the court below on December 8, 1932, and notice of its entry was served on the same day. Appellant’s motion for new trial was' denied on February 17, 1933, and notice of the order was waived in open court by counsel for appellant on the same day and entered in the minutes of the court. Notice of appeal and notice to the clerk to prepare a transcript was filed March 7, 1933. No security to the clerk for preparing the transcript was given and no transcript has been filed. No proceedings for the settlement of a bill of exceptions have been instituted and none are pending. Any proceedings to procure a transcript were terminated by order of the court below on June 9, 1933. Appellant has filed nothing in this court.

Appeal dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARKS, J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal. The record discloses that judgment was rendered and entered in favor of respondents in the court below on December 8, 1932, and notice of its entry was served on the same day. Appellant’s motion for new trial was' denied on February 17, 1933, and notice of the order was waived in open court by counsel for appellant on the same day and entered in the minutes of the court. Notice of appeal and notice to the clerk to prepare a transcript was filed March 7, 1933. No security to the clerk for preparing the transcript was given and no transcript has been filed. No proceedings for the settlement of a bill of exceptions have been instituted and none are pending. Any proceedings to procure a transcript were terminated by order of the court below on June 9, 1933. Appellant has filed nothing in this court.

Appeal dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 Cal. App. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shur-v-dufault-calctapp-1933.