Shuppe v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2009
Docket08-2145
StatusUnpublished

This text of Shuppe v. Commissioner of Social Security (Shuppe v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shuppe v. Commissioner of Social Security, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2145

KELLY F. SHUPPE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00057-FPS-JES)

Submitted: March 30, 2009 Decided: April 17, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly F. Shuppe, Appellant Pro Se. Tara A. Czekaj, Assistant Regional Counsel, Maija Pelly, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelly F. Shuppe appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm

the Commissioner’s decision denying disability insurance

benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the

decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct

law was applied. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West 2006 & Supp.

2008); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We

have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Shuppe v. Commissioner, No. 5:07-cv-

00057-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shuppe v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuppe-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2009.