Shundra Rutledge v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC and David Odhiambo
This text of Shundra Rutledge v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC and David Odhiambo (Shundra Rutledge v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC and David Odhiambo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 16, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00644-CV ——————————— SHUNDRA RUTLEDGE, Appellant V. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2019-03219
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Shundra Rutledge, filed a notice of appeal from a July 17, 2025
trial court order. On August 22, 2025, appellant filed a motion to dismiss her appeal.
In her motion, appellant stated that the trial court informed the parties that the order
appealed “did not dispose of the case” and the trial court would “hold a new hearing to argue the underlying motion for summary judgment.” Accordingly, appellant
stated that her appeal had been rendered “moot.” Appellant therefore requested that
the Court dismiss the appeal “so that the litigation in the trial court may proceed.”
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion
of appellant).
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of
conference stating that appellant conferred with all other parties regarding the merits
of the motion and whether the parties oppose the requested relief. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has opposed
the relief requested by appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shundra Rutledge v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC and David Odhiambo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shundra-rutledge-v-swift-transportation-services-llc-and-david-odhiambo-texapp-2025.