Shumate v. State
367 S.W.3d 156, 2012 WL 1857520, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 703
Opinion
[157] ORDER
Movant, Marcus Shumate, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shumate v. State, 367 S.W.3d 156, 2012 WL 1857520, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 703 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
367 S.W.3d 156 (Shumate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.