Shumate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shumate v. State

449 So. 2d 387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1984

DocketNo. 83-975

StatusPublished

This text of 449 So. 2d 387 (Shumate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shumate v. State, 449 So. 2d 387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Interstate Agreement on De-tainers Act (§§ 941.45-50, Fla.Stat.) ■ does not require that charges pending in Florida against a prisoner in a foreign state be dismissed for failure of the foreign prison officials to promptly notify the prisoner as to a Florida detainer or to assist him in delivering to the Florida state attorney and Florida court notice of his place of confinement and his request for trial under section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). See Coit v. State, 440 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Appellant was not denied his state or constitutional rights to a speedy trial. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Interstate Agreement on De-tainers Act (§§ 941.45-50, Fla.Stat.) ■ does not require that charges pending in Florida against a prisoner in a foreign state be dismissed for failure of the foreign prison officials to promptly notify the prisoner as to a Florida detainer or to assist him in delivering to the Florida state attorney and Florida court notice of his place of confinement and his request for trial under section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). See Coit v. State, 440 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Appellant was not denied his state or constitutional rights to a speedy trial. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

449 So. 2d 387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shumate-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack