Shuman v. Bower
278 A.D.2d 860, 718 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for recusal. ‘Where, as here, there is no allegation that recusal is statutorily required (see, Judiciary Law § 14), the matter of recusal is addressed to the discretion and personal conscience of the Justice whose recusal is sought” (Matter of Card v Siragusa, 214 AD2d 1022, 1023). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J. — Judiciary Law.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shuman v. Bower, 278 A.D.2d 860, 718 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
278 A.D.2d 860 (Shuman v. Bower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Angie M.P.
291 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Rumsey v. Niebel
286 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)