Shuman v. Bower

278 A.D.2d 860, 718 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 860 (Shuman v. Bower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shuman v. Bower, 278 A.D.2d 860, 718 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for recusal. ‘Where, as here, there is no allegation that recusal is statutorily required (see, Judiciary Law § 14), the matter of recusal is addressed to the discretion and personal conscience of the Justice whose recusal is sought” (Matter of Card v Siragusa, 214 AD2d 1022, 1023). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J. — Judiciary Law.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Angie M.P.
291 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Rumsey v. Niebel
286 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 860, 718 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuman-v-bower-nyappdiv-2000.