Shuman Supply Co. v. Webb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shuman Supply Co. v. Webb

176 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 193, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 830

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1970

Docket45168

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E.2d 510 (Shuman Supply Co. v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shuman Supply Co. v. Webb, 176 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 193, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitman, Judge.

To plaintiff Webb’s complaint containing two counts alleging and seeking damages for breach of contract of sale and conversion of the subject matter of the contract (an electric crane hoist), defendant Shuman Supply Co., Inc. moved for a summary judgment on the ground that the corporation did not own the crane; that the corporation was not a party to the contract; that the crane was the personal property of Jack Shuman, a resident of another county; that Jack Shuman was the party contracting with Webb; and therefore the action against the corporation must fail. The motion was denied but was certified for review.

The evidence presented on motion for summary judgment was conflicting and inconclusive with regard to the contention made therein. The trial court did not err in denying the motion. Watkins v. Nationwide &c. Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 801, 804 (149 SE2d 749); Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Hawes, 120 Ga. App. 4 (169 SE2d 356).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitman, Judge.

To plaintiff Webb’s complaint containing two counts alleging and seeking damages for breach of contract of sale and conversion of the subject matter of the contract (an electric crane hoist), defendant Shuman Supply Co., Inc. moved for a summary judgment on the ground that the corporation did not own the crane; that the corporation was not a party to the contract; that the crane was the personal property of Jack Shuman, a resident of another county; that Jack Shuman was the party contracting with Webb; and therefore the action against the corporation must fail. The motion was denied but was certified for review.

The evidence presented on motion for summary judgment was conflicting and inconclusive with regard to the contention made therein. The trial court did not err in denying the motion. Watkins v. Nationwide &c. Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 801, 804 (149 SE2d 749); Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Hawes, 120 Ga. App. 4 (169 SE2d 356).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 193, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuman-supply-co-v-webb-gactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack