Shumaker v. Security Life & Annuity Co.
This text of 153 F. 332 (Shumaker v. Security Life & Annuity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After argument and due consideration, we are of opinion the affidavits of defense disclose a good defense. The premium due at the expiration of the second year, viz., October 12, 1905, was not paid and the two prior premiums were not [335]*335paid in cash. Therefore, by the terms of the policy, no right to a cash loan on the policy or to an automatic nonforfeiture of the policy existed when the insured defaulted on the premium due October 12, 1905.
The rule for judgment is therefore discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 F. 332, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shumaker-v-security-life-annuity-co-circtedpa-1907.