Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.
166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773
Opinion
Plaintiffs were hired by defendant, a prime contractor, to perform certain services in conjunction with 2 construction jobs. Bills submitted by plaintiffs to defendant were disputed. Defendant contends reversible error occurred at trial in the introduction of certain evidence offered by plaintiffs and factual conclusions drawn by the trial court.
An examination of the record fails to disclose reversible error in the trial court’s rulings on these issues.
Affirmed. Costs to appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co., 166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).
166 N.W.2d 63 (Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.