Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.

166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1968
DocketDocket No. 4,294
StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.W.2d 63 (Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co., 166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs were hired by defendant, a prime contractor, to perform certain services in conjunction with 2 construction jobs. Bills submitted by plaintiffs to defendant were disputed. Defendant contends reversible error occurred at trial in the introduction of certain evidence offered by plaintiffs and factual conclusions drawn by the trial court.

An examination of the record fails to disclose reversible error in the trial court’s rulings on these issues.

Affirmed. Costs to appellees.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gillis and Corkin, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shumaker-v-michigan-office-equipment-co-michctapp-1968.