Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.
This text of 166 N.W.2d 63 (Shumaker v. Michigan Office Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs were hired by defendant, a prime contractor, to perform certain services in conjunction with 2 construction jobs. Bills submitted by plaintiffs to defendant were disputed. Defendant contends reversible error occurred at trial in the introduction of certain evidence offered by plaintiffs and factual conclusions drawn by the trial court.
An examination of the record fails to disclose reversible error in the trial court’s rulings on these issues.
Affirmed. Costs to appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 N.W.2d 63, 15 Mich. App. 21, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shumaker-v-michigan-office-equipment-co-michctapp-1968.