Shultz v. Ritterbusch
232 U.S. 719, 34 S. Ct. 601
This text of 232 U.S. 719 (Shultz v. Ritterbusch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shultz v. Ritterbusch, 232 U.S. 719, 34 S. Ct. 601 (1914).
Opinion
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (1) Consolidated Turnpike Company v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railroad Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600, and cases cited. (2) Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, 197 U. S. 430, 434, and cases cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
197 U.S. 430 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 U.S. 719, 34 S. Ct. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shultz-v-ritterbusch-scotus-1914.