Shultz v. O'Rourke

36 P.2d 1081, 1 Cal. App. 2d 647, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shultz v. O'Rourke. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Cal. App. 207
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 30, 1934·No. Civ. No. 8002·Published

Opinion

YORK, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered herein in favor of the defendants. The evidence and pleadings are in a very involved state, as are the briefs of the parties filed herein. The question raised by appellant is one that is answered by the general rule that where there is any evidence to support a finding, an appellate court cannot set up its judgment in lieu of that of the trial court. This is so as to the objections made by appellant to each of the findings to which he takes exception.

[648]*648No appeal lies from an order denying motion for a new trial, therefore the appeal from that order is dismissed. The judgment is affirmed.

Conrey, P. J., concurred.

Houser, J., concurred in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shultz v. O'Rourke, 36 P.2d 1081, 1 Cal. App. 2d 647, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

36 P.2d 1081 (Shultz v. O'Rourke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.