Shultz v. Moore
22 F. Cas. 54, 1 McLean 334
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
DecidedDecember 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 22 F. Cas. 54 (Shultz v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shultz v. Moore, 22 F. Cas. 54, 1 McLean 334 (circtdoh 1838).
Opinion
OPINION OF
Whe're the leading counsel in a case is prevented from attending the court by sickness, and the counsel in attendance is not prepared to go on with the trial, it is a sufficient ground for a continuance. The cause stands continued at the costs of the defendant. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Markson v. Ide
29 Kan. 700 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 54, 1 McLean 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shultz-v-moore-circtdoh-1838.