Shultz v. Moore
22 F. Cas. 54, 1 McLean 334
Opinion
OPINION OF
Whe're the leading counsel in a case is prevented from attending the court by sickness, and the counsel in attendance is not prepared to go on with the trial, it is a sufficient ground for a continuance. The cause stands continued at the costs of the defendant. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shultz v. Moore, 22 F. Cas. 54, 1 McLean 334 (circtdoh 1838).
22 F. Cas. 54 (Shultz v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Markson v. Ide
29 Kan. 700 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1883)