Shultz v. Mial

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Shultz v. Mial

90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 369, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 273

DecidedMarch 16, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A. 317 (Shultz v. Mial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shultz v. Mial, 90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 369, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 273 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

[370]*370For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Bogicrt, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Tebhune, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

[370]*370For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Bogicrt, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Tebhune, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 369, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shultz-v-mial-nj-1914.