Shultz v. Boehme
1 Monag. 245, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 711
This text of 1 Monag. 245 (Shultz v. Boehme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shultz v. Boehme, 1 Monag. 245, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 711 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
The question of evidence, which we have before us in this case, was properly determined in the court below. The question was ingeniously put, but it was clearly designed to draw out the fact, by a negative answer, that the bond had come into the defendant’s possession before the death of Agatha Bentz. Such being the case, the question was not allowable.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Monag. 245, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shultz-v-boehme-pa-1888.