Shulstad v. Berkel, Inc.
This text of 389 N.W.2d 346 (Shulstad v. Berkel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Shulstad appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his products liability action. The district court granted the motion of appellee, Berkel, Inc., d/b/a United States Slicing Machine Co., Inc. (Berkel), for summary judgment pursuant to § 28-01.1-02 of the North Dakota Century Code. We reverse and remand for trial.
On August 31, 1981, Shulstad, while employed by a retail meat market was severely injured. Shulstad was cleaning a meat grinder when a fellow employee turned on the power which engaged the auger. Shul-stad’s right hand was mangled and permanently injured. The meat grinder was manufactured by Berkel on July 8, 1965.
On appeal, Shulstad challenges the constitutionality of § 28-01.1-02, N.D.C.C., the “statute of limitation” of the North Dakota Products Liability Act. Recently, we considered the validity of § 28-01.1-02 and found it to be violative of Article I, § 21 of the North Dakota Constitution. Hanson v. Williams Co., 389 N.W.2d 319 (N.D.1986). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial.
I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Hanson v. Williams Co., 389 N.W.2d 319 (N.D.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 N.W.2d 346, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shulstad-v-berkel-inc-nd-1986.