Shulman v. United States
43 F. App'x 128
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2002·No. No. 01-55070; D.C. No. CV-00-12455-IFP·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Carol Lee Shulman appeals pro se the district court’s denial of her application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Shulman paid the filing fees in the district court after appealing the order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, her appeal is moot. See Lipscomb v. Madigan, 221 F.2d 798, 798 (9th Cir.1955).
DISMISSED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shulman v. United States, 43 F. App'x 128 (9th Cir. 2002).
43 F. App'x 128 (Shulman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Robert E. Lipscomb v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California
221 F.2d 798 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)