Shulman v. United States
This text of 43 F. App'x 128 (Shulman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Carol Lee Shulman appeals pro se the district court’s denial of her application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Shulman paid the filing fees in the district court after appealing the order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, her appeal is moot. See Lipscomb v. Madigan, 221 F.2d 798, 798 (9th Cir.1955).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 F. App'x 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shulman-v-united-states-ca9-2002.