Shulman v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shulman v. Safir

249 A.D.2d 10, 670 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3500

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 10 (Shulman v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shulman v. Safir, 249 A.D.2d 10, 670 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated July 29, 1996, revoking petitioner’s pistol licenses, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Friedman, J.], entered February 20, 1997), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination that petitioner lacks the character and fitness to possess firearms is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner impersonated a police officer for purposes of detaining a person in a traffic dispute (see, Sewell v City of New York, 182 AD2d 469, 472-473). The [11]*11penalty of revocation does not shock our sense of fairness, the dismissal of related criminal charges against petitioner notwithstanding (see, Matter of Zalmanov v Bratton, 240 AD2d 173). We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated July 29, 1996, revoking petitioner’s pistol licenses, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Friedman, J.], entered February 20, 1997), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination that petitioner lacks the character and fitness to possess firearms is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner impersonated a police officer for purposes of detaining a person in a traffic dispute (see, Sewell v City of New York, 182 AD2d 469, 472-473). The [11]*11penalty of revocation does not shock our sense of fairness, the dismissal of related criminal charges against petitioner notwithstanding (see, Matter of Zalmanov v Bratton, 240 AD2d 173). We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 10, 670 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shulman-v-safir-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack