Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shulman v. Kaplan

Shulman v. Kaplan

281 A.D. 674, 117 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3198
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 674 (Shulman v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shulman v. Kaplan, 281 A.D. 674, 117 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

In these filiation proceedings the mother and the child are nationals of the Dominion of Canada. They resided in Vancouver, B. C., and came into the State of New York on temporary visitors’ visas to institute this proceeding, the defendant being a resident here. Under these circumstances the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding (Feyler v. Mortimer, 299 N. Y. 309). Order unanimously affirmed upon the ground indicated above. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feyler v. Mortimer
87 N.E.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 674, 117 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shulman-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1952.