Shulman v. Kaplan
281 A.D. 674, 117 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3198
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1952·Published
Opinion
In these filiation proceedings the mother and the child are nationals of the Dominion of Canada. They resided in Vancouver, B. C., and came into the State of New York on temporary visitors’ visas to institute this proceeding, the defendant being a resident here. Under these circumstances the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding (Feyler v. Mortimer, 299 N. Y. 309). Order unanimously affirmed upon the ground indicated above. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shulman v. Kaplan, 281 A.D. 674, 117 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
281 A.D. 674 (Shulman v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feyler v. Mortimer
87 N.E.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)