Shull v. Yeargain

1931 OK 326, 300 P. 307, 149 Okla. 224, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 231
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 9, 1931·No. 20991·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in favor of the defendants in error, plaintiffs in the trial court and hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, and against the plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court and hereinafter referred to as defendant.

The issue of law presented is identical with that presented in cause No. 20510, entitled J. D. Yeargain et al. v. C. G. Shull, Bank Commissioner, this day decided, 149 Okla. 221, 300 Pac. 303. The rule of law announced therein is herein applied.

The', facts herein differ in no material respect from the facts in that case except that herein the district court of Oklahoma county rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant, which judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court of Oklahoma county, with directions to dismiss the action.

CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY., CULLISON SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAT, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and HEPNER, J.. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shull v. Yeargain, 1931 OK 326, 300 P. 307, 149 Okla. 224, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 231 (Okla. 1931).

1931 OK 326 (Shull v. Yeargain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Ehly
185 Okla. 336 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
In Re Farmers State Bank of Garber
1938 OK 602 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Deems v. Milligan
1937 OK 33 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)