Shull v. State

1913 OK 187, 130 P. 910, 35 Okla. 588, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 11, 1913
Docket2421
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1913 OK 187 (Shull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shull v. State, 1913 OK 187, 130 P. 910, 35 Okla. 588, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 125 (Okla. 1913).

Opinion

KANE, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court' of Custer county, dismissing an appeal from the final action of the treasurer of that county, finding that certain personal property belonging to the plaintiff in error had been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years.

In State et al. v. Cawthorn’s Estate, 31 Okla. 560, 122 Pac. 522, it was held that “the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to review, on appeal thereto, an order or judgment of a county court made in an appeal to such court from a decision and order of a county treasurer, assessing property for taxation, alleged to have been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years.”

On the authority of the foregoing case, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

WILLIAMS, DUNN and TURNER, JJ., concur; HAYES, C. J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

School Dist. No. 7 of Johnston County v. Cunningham
151 P. 633 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1913 OK 187, 130 P. 910, 35 Okla. 588, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shull-v-state-okla-1913.