Shull v. State

1913 OK 187, 130 P. 910, 35 Okla. 588, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 125
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 11, 1913·No. 2421·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KANE, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court' of Custer county, dismissing an appeal from the final action of the treasurer of that county, finding that certain personal property belonging to the plaintiff in error had been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years.

In State et al. v. Cawthorn’s Estate, 31 Okla. 560, 122 Pac. 522, it was held that “the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to review, on appeal thereto, an order or judgment of a county court made in an appeal to such court from a decision and order of a county treasurer, assessing property for taxation, alleged to have been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years.”

On the authority of the foregoing case, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

WILLIAMS, DUNN and TURNER, JJ., concur; HAYES, C. J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shull v. State, 1913 OK 187, 130 P. 910, 35 Okla. 588, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 125 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 187 (Shull v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Dist. No. 7 of Johnston County v. Cunningham
151 P. 633 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)