Shull v. Shull
58 Colo. 348
Opinion
(Department No. 1.)
In the absence of a duly authenticated and properly certified bill of exceptions, the questions raised by plaintiff in error cannot be considered. The judgment of the County Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shull v. Shull, 58 Colo. 348 (Colo. 1914).
58 Colo. 348 (Shull v. Shull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mason v. Le Clair Mines Co.
19 P.2d 209 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1933)