Shulga v. Ashcroft

11 A.D.3d 894, 782 N.Y.S.2d 221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shulga v. Ashcroft. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 A.D.3d 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2004·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered September 9, 2003. The amended order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, dismissed the first, second and fourth affirmative defenses and denied defendant’s cross motion [895]*895for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777, 779 [1978]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shulga v. Ashcroft, 11 A.D.3d 894, 782 N.Y.S.2d 221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 894 (Shulga v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kolasz v. Levitt
63 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)