Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus

233 A.D. 892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it appears presumptively from the papers that the person sought to be brought in as party defendant was the agent of the plaintiff and, therefore, no joint judgment could be recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant and the person sought to be brought in, for the negligence of the person sought to be brought in would be imputable to the plaintiff and defeat the plaintiff’s recovery against the defendant. Nothing appears in the record to controvert the presumption. All concur. Present -— Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [138 Misc. 814.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus, 233 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

233 A.D. 892 (Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darrohn v. Russell
154 Misc. 753 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)