Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus
This text of 233 A.D. 892 (Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it appears presumptively from the papers that the person sought to be brought in as party defendant was the agent of the plaintiff and, therefore, no joint judgment could be recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant and the person sought to be brought in, for the negligence of the person sought to be brought in would be imputable to the plaintiff and defeat the plaintiff’s recovery against the defendant. Nothing appears in the record to controvert the presumption. All concur. Present -— Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [138 Misc. 814.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuler-v-whitmore-rauber-vicinus-nyappdiv-1931.