Shuler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shuler v. State

929 So. 2d 645, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7401, 2006 WL 1310378

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-2161

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 645 (Shuler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shuler v. State, 929 So. 2d 645, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7401, 2006 WL 1310378 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his convictions for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and driving while license suspended or revoked. Although his other arguments lack merit, the appellant correctly argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a severance of the charges. See Tucker v. State, 884 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); State v. Vazquez, 419 So.2d 1088 (Fla.1982). The appellant’s conviction for driving while license suspended or revoked is therefore reversed and the case is remanded on that count. The conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not affected by the trial court’s error and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his convictions for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and driving while license suspended or revoked. Although his other arguments lack merit, the appellant correctly argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a severance of the charges. See Tucker v. State, 884 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); State v. Vazquez, 419 So.2d 1088 (Fla.1982). The appellant’s conviction for driving while license suspended or revoked is therefore reversed and the case is remanded on that count. The conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not affected by the trial court’s error and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

929 So. 2d 645, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7401, 2006 WL 1310378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuler-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack