Shuler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shuler v. State

213 So. 2d 312, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5123

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 13, 1968

DocketNos. 67-1072, 67-1073

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 213 So. 2d 312 (Shuler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shuler v. State, 213 So. 2d 312, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By these consolidated appeals the appellant, defendant in the criminal court of record, seeks review of non-jury convictions finding him guilty of larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property. The principle attacked on both convictions is insufficiency of evidence to support same.

Resolving all conflicts in support of the judgment of conviction and reasonable inferences therefrom [Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 68; Hennessy v. State, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 37] we find sufficient competent evidence to support both convictions, under the authority of MacDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 So. 485; Kemp v. State, 146 Fla. 101, 200 So. 368; Borghese v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 785; Shaw v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 477, and do hereby affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By these consolidated appeals the appellant, defendant in the criminal court of record, seeks review of non-jury convictions finding him guilty of larceny of an automobile and receiving stolen property. The principle attacked on both convictions is insufficiency of evidence to support same.

Resolving all conflicts in support of the judgment of conviction and reasonable inferences therefrom [Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Walden v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 68; Hennessy v. State, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 37] we find sufficient competent evidence to support both convictions, under the authority of MacDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 So. 485; Kemp v. State, 146 Fla. 101, 200 So. 368; Borghese v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 785; Shaw v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 477, and do hereby affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 So. 2d 312, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuler-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack