Shuler v. City of Bristol
This text of 60 So. 3d 501 (Shuler v. City of Bristol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We decline to disturb an award of attorney’s fees ordered to make whole a property owner who was required to incur them in order to procure dissolution of a lien having no arguable legal basis, particularly since the trial court found the lien [502]*502had been placed vindictively. Cf. S & T Builders v. Globe Props., Inc., 944 So.2d 302, 305 (Fla.2006) (authorizing an award of the fees incurred in procuring the discharge of a wrongly filed lis pendens). We affirm, despite the trial court’s misplaced reference to the “Construction Lien Law.” See Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 644-45 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 So. 3d 501, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5649, 2011 WL 1501989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuler-v-city-of-bristol-fladistctapp-2011.