Shuh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shuh v. State

598 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829, 1992 WL 115765

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1992·No. No. 91-1872·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing and a rehearing on the suitability of imposing an adult sentence on the appellant. The trial court erred by failing to reduce to writing its decision to impose adult sanctions. E.g., Ford v. State, 576 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 39.111(7)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because they are now moot, we do not address the issues raised on appeal concerning the adequacy of the trial court’s oral findings.

LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing and a rehearing on the suitability of imposing an adult sentence on the appellant. The trial court erred by failing to reduce to writing its decision to impose adult sanctions. E.g., Ford v. State, 576 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 39.111(7)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because they are now moot, we do not address the issues raised on appeal concerning the adequacy of the trial court’s oral findings.

LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Shuh v. State, 598 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829, 1992 WL 115765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

598 So. 2d 334 (Shuh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related