Shuggars v. Brake

234 A.2d 752, 248 Md. 38, 1967 Md. LEXIS 297
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 9, 1967·No. [No. 589, September Term, 1966.]·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Horney, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Whether or not the appellees (Philip I. Brake, et ux. and Eugene R. Gaither, et ux.) have an easement by prescription *40 over a roadway on the land of one of the appellants (Catherine I. Shuggars), is the only question presented by this appeal.

Catherine I. Shuggars, formerly Hager, is the owner of the house and lot 1 located in the Damascus District of Montgomery County, where she now resides with her present husband, William T. Shuggars, and the adjoining one-half acre schoolhouse lot, 2 which she and her former husband acquired from the county Board of Education in 1940. Both lots front on State Route 27 and the school lot is bounded by the easterly line of the Gaither lot. The disputed roadway lies within the bounds of the school lot and extends the whole depth of the lot from the highway to the Gaither lot.

Eugene R. and Mary E. Gaither are the owners of a lot, 3 containing one and one-half acres, located off the state highway at the rear of the school lot. The only access to the Gaither lot from the highway is the disputed roadway along the northerly line of the school lot.

Philip I. and Elaine E. Brake are the owners of two lots or parcels of land, 4 5 containing eight and six-tenths acres in the aggregate, lying to the south and west of the Gaither lot with a narrow strip of land along the northerly line of the Gaither lot (which together with a “deeded” right of way over the Gaither lot extending from the westerly end of the disputed roadway in a northerly direction to the easterly end of the above mentioned narrow strip of land) is used by the Brakes as a roadway to and from their property to the disputed school lot roadway leading to the state highway.

*41

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shuggars v. Brake, 234 A.2d 752, 248 Md. 38, 1967 Md. LEXIS 297 (Md. 1967).

234 A.2d 752 (Shuggars v. Brake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Haas
341 F. Supp. 3d 607 (D. Maryland, 2018)
Montgomery County v. Bhatt
130 A.3d 424 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2016)
Purnell v. Beard & Bone, LLC
38 A.3d 534 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2012)
Clickner v. Magothy River Ass'n
35 A.3d 464 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)
Turner v. Bouchard
32 A.3d 527 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
Banks v. Pusey
904 A.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2006)
Washington Land Co. v. Potomac Ridge Development Corp.
767 A.2d 891 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States
733 A.2d 1055 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1999)
Mavromoustakos v. Padussis
684 A.2d 51 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Hoffman v. UNITED IRON AND METAL COMPANY, INC.
671 A.2d 55 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Forrester v. Kiler
633 A.2d 913 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Cristofani v. Board of Education
632 A.2d 447 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Mahoney v. Devonshire, Inc.
587 A.2d 1146 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1991)
Gilman v. McCrary
640 P.2d 482 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1982)
Zehner v. Fink
311 A.2d 477 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1973)
DC TRANSIT v. State Rds. Comm'n
290 A.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. State Roads Commission
290 A.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
Furman E. Hendrix, Inc. v. Hanna
243 A.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1968)