Shuffleton v. Hill

California Supreme Court

Shuffleton v. Hill

7 P. 7, 2 Cal. Unrep. 473

California Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1885·No. No. 8650·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as [474] his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as [474] his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.

Shuffleton v. Hill, 7 P. 7, 2 Cal. Unrep. 473 (Cal. 1885).

Pincite

7 P. 7 (Shuffleton v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related