Shuffleton v. Hill
7 P. 7, 2 Cal. Unrep. 473
This text of 7 P. 7 (Shuffleton v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shuffleton v. Hill, 7 P. 7, 2 Cal. Unrep. 473 (Cal. 1885).
Opinion
We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as [474]*474his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Virden v. Neese
152 P.2d 761 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 P. 7, 2 Cal. Unrep. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuffleton-v-hill-cal-1885.