Shuff v. Wright

258 So. 2d 690, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6577
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 2, 1972·No. No. 3807·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond has not been timely filed.

Article 2088 of the La.Code of Civil Procedure provides that the jurisdiction of the trial court is divested, and that of the appellate court attaches, upon the timely filing of the appeal bond in the trial court if a bond is required. Although the order of appeal signed by the trial judge specified a One Hundred and no/100 ($100.00) Dollar bond, the record contains no evidence that such bond was ever filed and the jurisdiction of this court has therefore never attached. Arnold v. Arnold, 217 La. 362, 46 So.2d 298; City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper, La.App., 96 So.2d 241.

The motion to dismiss presents the issue of whether the ninety (90) days granted appellant within which to file his bond by La.C.C.P. Art. 2087 have expired. We, however, have no power to determine that issue, since for the reasons hereinabove set out, we lack jurisdiction over the case.

Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court for a determination of whether the time allowed for the posting of the appeal bond has indeed expired, and if so, for the rescission of its order of appeal.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shuff v. Wright, 258 So. 2d 690, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6577 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

258 So. 2d 690 (Shuff v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. Arnold
46 So. 2d 298 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper
96 So. 2d 241 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1957)