Shufelt v. Cramer

20 Johns. 309
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 309 (Shufelt v. Cramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shufelt v. Cramer, 20 Johns. 309 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Justice was bound to wait a reasonable time for the appearance of the parties. No case has yet decided what shall be considered a reasonable time. We think, however, that waiting a full hour after the time appointed, is giving a sufficient and reasonable time for the appearance of either party. This is in conformity to the practice on a summons to show cause before a Judge. We are of opinion, that, as a general rule, the Justice must wait an hour for the appearance of the parties, and that he need wait no longer, unless some excuse which he shall deem reasonable, be shown, for giving further indulgence. In the [310]*310present case, there was no excuse for not appearing at the end of the hour after the time appointed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols v. Place
23 N.Y.S. 134 (New York County Courts, 1893)
In re Gilley
10 F. Cas. 390 (D. Massachusetts, 1873)
Phelps v. Davis
88 Mass. 287 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1863)
Sherwood v. Saratoga & Washington Railroad
15 Barb. 650 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Johns. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shufelt-v-cramer-nysupct-1822.