Shudde v. Kingsbury

California Supreme Court

Shudde v. Kingsbury

206 Cal. 792

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1928

DocketS. F. No. 12708

StatusPublished

This text of 206 Cal. 792 (Shudde v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shudde v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 792 (Cal. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

For similar reasons as assigned in Boone v. Kingsbury, Surveyor-General of the State of California, etc., S. F. No. 12707, ante, p. 148 [273 Pac. 797], this day filed, the surveyor-general of the state is commanded to issue to petitioner, H. E. Shudde, a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the tide and submerged lands described in his petition. The writ will therefore issue.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

For similar reasons as assigned in Boone v. Kingsbury, Surveyor-General of the State of California, etc., S. F. No. 12707, ante, p. 148 [273 Pac. 797], this day filed, the surveyor-general of the state is commanded to issue to petitioner, H. E. Shudde, a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the tide and submerged lands described in his petition. The writ will therefore issue.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 Cal. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shudde-v-kingsbury-cal-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack