Shubrick v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shubrick v. Wing

303 A.D.2d 744, 757 N.Y.S.2d 450, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3481

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 744 (Shubrick v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shubrick v. Wing, 303 A.D.2d 744, 757 N.Y.S.2d 450, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants’ housing allowance [745]*745schedules set forth in 18 NYCRR 352.3 violate the plaintiffs federal and state statutory rights to obtain and retain decent, safe, and adequate housing, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction directing them to pay the plaintiff an enhanced shelter allowance of $950 per month.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied (see McVay v Wing, 303 AD2d 727 [2003] [decided herewith]). Krausman, J.P., Townes, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants’ housing allowance [745]*745schedules set forth in 18 NYCRR 352.3 violate the plaintiffs federal and state statutory rights to obtain and retain decent, safe, and adequate housing, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered February 4, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction directing them to pay the plaintiff an enhanced shelter allowance of $950 per month.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied (see McVay v Wing, 303 AD2d 727 [2003] [decided herewith]). Krausman, J.P., Townes, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 744, 757 N.Y.S.2d 450, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shubrick-v-wing-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack