Shubert v. Lawrence

New York Court of Appeals

Shubert v. Lawrence

136 N.E.2d 913, 1 N.Y.2d 914

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 11, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 N.E.2d 913 (Shubert v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shubert v. Lawrence, 136 N.E.2d 913, 1 N.Y.2d 914 (N.Y. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. First and second questions certified answered in the negative. Third question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Frobssel and Burke, JJ. Van Voorhis, J., concurs but entertains the view that no liquidation can occur resulting in placing the Lee Shubert estate in the position of an ordinary creditor under section 73 of the Partnership Law, by reason of the action taken by Jacob J. Shubert in the light of the will of Lee Shubert,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. First and second questions certified answered in the negative. Third question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Frobssel and Burke, JJ. Van Voorhis, J., concurs but entertains the view that no liquidation can occur resulting in placing the Lee Shubert estate in the position of an ordinary creditor under section 73 of the Partnership Law, by reason of the action taken by Jacob J. Shubert in the light of the will of Lee Shubert,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 N.E.2d 913, 1 N.Y.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shubert-v-lawrence-ny-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack