Shuart v. Heidgerd

283 A.D. 895, 129 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5679

This text of 283 A.D. 895 (Shuart v. Heidgerd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shuart v. Heidgerd, 283 A.D. 895, 129 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, whereby plaintiff agreed to purchase about seventy-two acres of vacant real property from the defendant, and defendant agreed to convey such property to plaintiff by a full covenant warranty deed. On the adjourned closing date, defendant tendered such a deed, containing a covenant to the effect that the premises, except a strip about 1,425 feet long by 600 feet deep, “shall be used for residential housing purposes only, which restriction shall be perpetual and run with the land.” Defendant demanded that such covenant be included in a bond and mortgage to be delivered by plaintiff. Plaintiff claims that he is entitled to receive the deed and is required to deliver the bond and mortgage, without such covenant. Defendant claims the covenant should be included in both. The controversy submitted for decision is whether or not specific performance should be decreed in conformity with plaintiff’s claim or with defendant’s claim. On the stipulation of the parties, judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff and against defendant, without costs. Present— Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 895, 129 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuart-v-heidgerd-nyappdiv-1954.